Posted in | News | Quantum Dots

Quantum Dots Disrupt Protein Function, Raising New Toxicity Concerns

In a paper published in the journal Scientific Reports, researchers used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the interactions between graphene quantum dots (GQDs), graphene oxide QDs (GOQDs), and the human intestinal fatty acid binding protein (HIFABP).

Quantum Dots Affect Protein Function, Raise Toxicity Concerns
Study: Potential toxicity of Graphene (Oxide) quantum dots to the human intestinal fatty acid binding protein (HIFABP) via obstructing the protein’s openings. Image Credit: vectorfusionart/Shutterstock.com

The study found that both graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and graphene oxide quantum dots (GOQDs) can block the opening of the HIFABP protein, potentially causing toxicity by hindering its normal biological function. The binding of GQDs to HIFABP was driven by van der Waals (vdW), pi (π)-π stacking, cation-π, and hydrophobic interactions, while GOQDs used similar interactions, including vdW and Coulomb forces. These results highlight the potentially toxic effects of GQDs on HIFABP.

Related Work

Previous studies have demonstrated the unique properties of GQDs, which hold promise for applications in electronics, optics, and medicine. However, concerns have emerged over their toxicity, with conflicting reports on their environmental and biological safety.

Some studies indicate minimal toxicity, while others emphasize that factors such as size, concentration, and surface chemistry play significant roles. Despite ongoing research, challenges remain in fully understanding the molecular interactions and long-term safety of these nanomaterials.

Simulation Methodology Overview

This study used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the GROMACS software and the CHARMM27 force field to examine interactions between GQDs, GOQDs, and HIFABP.

Systems were dissolved in water with 0.15 M NaCl, with an additional system containing 10 GQDs to assess concentration effects. Simulations were run at 300 K with long-range electrostatic interactions calculated using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method and vdW interactions cut off at 1.2 nm. Data were collected every 10 ps over 100-ns trajectories.

Interactions Between GQDs/GOQDs and HIFABP

HIFABP has an internal cavity surrounded by β-strands that facilitates fatty acid transport, with two openings allowing fatty acids to enter. Through 20 parallel simulations, researchers observed that GQD consistently positioned itself near one of HIFABP’s openings, often partially or fully entering the cavity and potentially obstructing fatty acid transport.

Contact probability analysis showed that GQD was highly likely to bind to the top portal of HIFABP, suggesting preferential obstruction at this site. Additional contacts with residues near the bottom portal were observed, though only one simulation showed GQD obstructing this region. These interactions indicate that GQD may interfere with both portals of HIFABP, affecting its function.

Analysis of specific residues involved in GQD binding revealed that several hydrophobic and aromatic residues contributed to GQD’s affinity for HIFABP, with hydrophobic forces and π-π stacking playing a significant role. Time-evolution analysis of vdW interaction energy indicated dynamic binding, with GQD establishing stable contact as it approached the cavity interior.

GOQD showed similar binding behavior, obstructing the HIFABP portal consistently across multiple simulations. Contact probability analysis confirmed this pattern, suggesting that GOQD likely disrupts HIFABP function via mechanisms similar to those of GQD.

Conclusion

This study constructed two simulation systems—GQD/HIFABP and GOQD/HIFABP—to examine the potential impact of these nanostructures on HIFABP. Results showed that GQDs bound to HIFABP’s portal, blocking fatty acid entry and inhibiting normal function. Binding was mediated by vdW, π-π stacking, cation-π, and hydrophobic interactions. GOQD also obstructed the same portal, suggesting a comparable mechanism of toxicity. Overall, these findings highlight how GQDs and GOQDs may disrupt HIFABP’s carrier function, emphasizing potential risks in future applications. Further biophysical studies are needed to validate these results in complex biological environments.

Journal Reference

Luo, Y., et al. (2024). Potential toxicity of Graphene (Oxide) quantum dots to the human intestinal fatty acid binding protein (HIFABP) via obstructing the protein’s openings. Scientific Reports, 14:1, 1-12. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73037-z, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-73037-z

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Silpaja Chandrasekar

Written by

Silpaja Chandrasekar

Dr. Silpaja Chandrasekar has a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Anna University, Chennai. Her research expertise lies in analyzing traffic parameters under challenging environmental conditions. Additionally, she has gained valuable exposure to diverse research areas, such as detection, tracking, classification, medical image analysis, cancer cell detection, chemistry, and Hamiltonian walks.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. (2024, October 29). Quantum Dots Disrupt Protein Function, Raising New Toxicity Concerns. AZoQuantum. Retrieved on November 21, 2024 from https://www.azoquantum.com/News.aspx?newsID=10574.

  • MLA

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. "Quantum Dots Disrupt Protein Function, Raising New Toxicity Concerns". AZoQuantum. 21 November 2024. <https://www.azoquantum.com/News.aspx?newsID=10574>.

  • Chicago

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. "Quantum Dots Disrupt Protein Function, Raising New Toxicity Concerns". AZoQuantum. https://www.azoquantum.com/News.aspx?newsID=10574. (accessed November 21, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. 2024. Quantum Dots Disrupt Protein Function, Raising New Toxicity Concerns. AZoQuantum, viewed 21 November 2024, https://www.azoquantum.com/News.aspx?newsID=10574.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.