Editorial Feature

The Bohr Atomic Model

The Bohr Model is a representation of the atom where negatively-charged electrons orbit around a positively-charged nucleus in the same way that the planets of the solar system orbit the sun. In the latter, the force holding the planets and the sun together is a gravitational force; whereas in the Bohr Model of the Atom, the electrons and nucleus are held together by an electrical force.

Brief History of Modern Models of the Atom

1904 - JJ Thomson’s Plum Pudding Model

JJ Thompson’s plum pudding model of the atom is best explained by imagining a plum pudding (or a blueberry muffin if you prefer): the plums in the pudding play the role of negatively charged electrons immersed in a dispersed positively charged pudding. This helped the model to achieve its primary purpose of explaining why most atoms were neutral.

1911 - Rutherford’s Model

Ernest Rutherford arranged for an experiment to take place in 1909 by scientist Hans Geiger and his student Ernest Marsden. The experiment, commonly known as the gold-foil experiment, involved sending a beam of alpha particles through a very thin gold foil.

Under JJ Thompson’s model all the particles were expected to pass straight through the foil; in reality it was found that some of the particles emerged at different angles and some even bounced straight back. These results were evidence against JJ Thompson’s Plum Pudding Model and prompted Rutherford in 1911 to develop his own model of the atom with a positively charged mass at the center of the atom. Thus he invented the concept of the atomic nucleus. This was in sharp contrast to Thompson’s previous model in which the positive charge was dispersed throughout the atom.

1913 - Bohr’s Model

Niels Bohr developed Rutherford’s earlier atomic model by proposing that electrons travel in orbits around the nucleus. His model allowed the outer orbits to hold more electrons than the inner orbits. He also suggested that the number of electrons in the outer orbits determined the chemical properties of the atom.

The electrons in Bohr’s model were not static within their orbits. Bohr proposed that electrons may jump from one orbit to another and suggested that this could be the mechanism behind the emission of radiation. This theory was later developed into quantum mechanics.

The Need for Bohr’s Atomic Model

There was a critical problem with Rutherford’s earlier model of the atom: it was not very stable. This was because, according to the rules of physics, electrons orbiting the nucleus would give off energy in the form of photons. This would cause the electrons to spiral into the nucleus and thus the atom could not exist.

What Bohr Proposed

Bohr circumvented the problem with Rutherford’s Atomic Model by proposing that electrons “jump” between orbits when they gain or lose energy. Thus, they do not exist in a state in-between the orbits.

The main points of Bohr’s atomic theory are:-

  • Negatively charged electrons orbit a positively charged nucleus in orbits with set energy levels.
  • The further away the energy level is from the nucleus, the higher the energy it has. It is thus given a higher number.
  • The energy levels hold different numbers of electrons. The smaller the energy level, the lower the number of electrons it holds, e.g. level 1 holds up to 2 electrons, level 2 holds up to 8 electrons and so forth.
  • When an electron moves from one orbit to another the atom absorbs or emits radiation.

Problems with Bohr’s Atomic Model

  • Bohr’s model does not work very well for complex atoms; for example it does not work very well for atoms with more than one electron in their outer shell.
  • The model gives no reason why electrons are solely confined to specific orbits.
  • The model does not explain why only a certain number of electrons fit in each orbit; for example why can only 2 electrons fit in the first shell?
  • It does not fit with the later developed quantum mechanical principle – Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle – because Bohr’s model asserts that both an electron’s radius and orbit can be simultaneously known.

Alterations to Bohr’s Model

In 1916 Arnold Sommerfeld proposed an alteration to Bohr’s model. He suggested that electrons travelled in elliptical orbits. (Incidentally, this is analogous to when Kepler, many centuries earlier, suggested that the planets had elliptical orbits rather than perfect circular ones!)

Sources and Further Reading

This article was updated on the 18th September, 2018.

April Cashin-Garbutt

Written by

April Cashin-Garbutt

April graduated with a first-class honours degree in Natural Sciences from Pembroke College, University of Cambridge. During her time as Editor-in-Chief, News-Medical (2012-2017), she kickstarted the content production process and helped to grow the website readership to over 60 million visitors per year. Through interviewing global thought leaders in medicine and life sciences, including Nobel laureates, April developed a passion for neuroscience and now works at the Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, located within UCL.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Cashin-Garbutt, April. (2023, May 13). The Bohr Atomic Model. AZoQuantum. Retrieved on November 21, 2024 from https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=11.

  • MLA

    Cashin-Garbutt, April. "The Bohr Atomic Model". AZoQuantum. 21 November 2024. <https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=11>.

  • Chicago

    Cashin-Garbutt, April. "The Bohr Atomic Model". AZoQuantum. https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=11. (accessed November 21, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Cashin-Garbutt, April. 2023. The Bohr Atomic Model. AZoQuantum, viewed 21 November 2024, https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=11.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.